Its a new year with the samebeef.
UMG also distributes Lamars music through Interscope Records.
Certified pedophiles, and the double-entendre Tryna strike a chord, and its probably A-Minor.
Drake watches the Sacramento Kings play the Toronto Raptors.Mark Blinch/Getty Images
In turn, the suit claims, his reputation and security have been repeatedly harmed.
In contrast, creators would typically not get paid if they used copyrighted material in their clips.
His Not Like Us reaction video from last spring has earned 6.6 million views since.
Ziasfirst respondedto the suit on X with a three-second meme of mystified characters saying, Huh?
Huh, Woah, What?
He also says that other creators reached out to his Interscope contact as well.
But I know from our end, that wasnt the case.
UMG has not responded toRolling Stones request for comment on that matter.
It was fruitful, he says.
It was a lot.
I think everybody could attest to that.
Everybody ate from that situation.
However, both Zias and B. Lou reject the notion that monetization incentivized their reaction to the song.
Nobody was going to be like, Oh, they letting us make money from it.
Lets react a certain way.
This nigga Drake done snitched on the reaction community!
Nigga we chillin, having fun, and you got us listed in a case?
This gotta be the softest nigga ever, dog.
He also pointed out that the suit only named creators with large followings.
If you gon put some of us, you gotta put all of us, he said.
No Life Shaq did not respond toRolling Stones request for further comment.
Other creators named in the suit had quicker but equally bewildered responses.
CartierFamily expressed a similar disbelief on X bywriting, Woah we are mentioned in a Drake lawsuit??
with three laughing emojis.
